Bourgeois
Bourgeois v. Pentec Health, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PENNY BOURGEOIS, Case No. 23-cv-06375-HSG
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR
v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND
DENYING MOTION TO REMAND
PENTEC HEALTH, INC., Re: Dkt. Nos. 43, 58 Defendant.
12 Pending before the Court is a motion for summary judgment filed by Defendant Pentec Health, Inc., Dkt. No. 43, and a motion to remand filed by Plaintiff Penny Bourgeois, Dkt. No. 58. The Court finds these matters appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matters are deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the motion for summary judgment and DENIES the motion to remand. I. BACKGROUND The parties are familiar with the facts of this case, and the Court includes them here only as relevant to the pending motion. The following facts are based on the evidence viewed in the light most favorable to…