Berger
Berger v. State Farm General Insurance Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MATTHEW BERGER, et al., Case No. 24-cv-02060-HSG
Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
v. Re: Dkt. No. 28 STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE
COMPANY,
11 Defendant. 12 Pending before the Court is a motion for summary judgment filed by Defendant State Farm General Insurance Company. Dkt. No. 28. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court DENIES the motion for summary judgment. Summary judgment is proper when a “movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a). A fact is “material” if it “might affect the outcome of the suit under the governing law.” Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248 (1986). And a dispute is “genuine” if there is evidence in the record sufficient for a reasonable trier of…