Biden

(PC) Heizelman v. Biden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20251:24-cv-01140California556 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT HEIZELMAN et al., Case No. 1:24-cv-01140-KES-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING

v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS, AND DISMISSING

PRESIDENT BIDEN, et al., ACTION WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C.A § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), (ii) Defendants. Docs. 2, 8, 9, 10

17 Plaintiff Robert Heizelman is a state prisoner proceeding pro se on his complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Doc. 1. Plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Doc. 2. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 18, 2024, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations (“F&R”), recommending denial of plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis because plaintiff had at least three strikes. Doc. 8. The magistrate judge additionally recommended dismissal of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.