Stockton v. Smith
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20254:24-cv-06676California3,352 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ROBERT JOHN STOCKTON, Case No. 24-cv-06676-HSG
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE
AMENDED COMPLAINT;
v. DISMISSING AMENDED COMPLAINT
WITH LEAVE TO AMEND; DENYING
SMITH, et al., REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF
COUNSEL
Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 17 at 22; Dkt. No. 18
13 Plaintiff, an inmate currently housed at Pelican Bay State Prison (“PBSP”), has filed a pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In this order, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s request for leave to file an amended complaint, Dkt. No. 18 at 1; screens Plaintiff’s complaint (Dkt. No. 17) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A; and DENIES Plaintiff’s requests for appointment of counsel, Dkt. No. 17 at 22, Dkt. No. 18 at 2-3. Plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in a separate order. DISCUSSION I. Request for Leave to File Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 18 at 1) Plaintiff commenced this…