Donna Lynn Hull Anderson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DONNA A., Case No. 5:23-cv-00606-MEMF (DFM)
Plaintiff, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND v. RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
15 Defendant.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”). Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been made. The Report recommends that the decision of the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) be affirmed and that this action be dismissed with prejudice. (ECF No. 29.) Plaintiff’s objections to the Report (ECF No. 30) do not warrant a change to the Magistrate Judge’s findings or recommendations. Plaintiff objects that the ALJ failed to properly account for Plaintiff’s irritable bowel syndrome (“IBS”) despite finding the condition severe. …