Abdul-Hafeez

Abdul-Hafeez v. City of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20253:24-cv-01184California6,632 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MUSLAH ABDUL-HAFEEZ, Case No.: 24-cv-1184-RSH-DDL

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO DISMISS

PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED

CITY OF SAN DIEGO, et al.,

COMPLAINT, AND PLAINTIFF’S

Defendants. REQUEST TO FILE SURREPLY,

AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

[ECF Nos. 12, 15] 18 19 Before the Court is a motion to dismiss, filed by defendants City of San Diego (“City”) and San Diego Police Department (“SDPD”) officer Dominic Lazaga (collectively “Defendants”). ECF No. 12. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7.1(d)(1), the Court finds the motion presented appropriate for resolution without oral argument. For the reasons below, the Court grants Defendants’ motion. I. BACKGROUND A. Plaintiff’s Allegations The instant civil rights action arises from Plaintiff’s arrest and detention. The First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) alleges as follows. Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.