Impossible Foods Inc. v. Impossible X LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 IMPOSSIBLE FOODS INC., Case No. 5:21-cv-02419-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF

v. IMPOSSIBLE FOODS INC.’S MOTION

TO AMEND COMPLAINT AND

IMPOSSIBLE LLC et al., SCHEDULING ORDER; AND

DENYING MOTION TO CONSIDER

Defendants. WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY’S

MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED

12 [Re: Dkt. Nos. 137, 139]

14 Before the Court is Plaintiff Impossible Foods Inc.’s (“IF”) Motion to Amend Complaint and Scheduling Order. Dkt. No. 137 (“Mot.”). Defendants Impossible LLC and Joel Runyon (collectively, “Defendants” or “ILLC”) filed a “qualified objection” to the motion. Dkt. No. 142 (“Obj.”). Plaintiff filed a reply in support of its motion. Dkt. No. 143 (“Reply”). The Court finds this motion suitable for submission without oral argument and hereby VACATES the hearing scheduled for May 8, 2025. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS…