(PC) Kalaaukahi v. Salinas Gonzalez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES KALAAUKAHI, Case No. 2:23-cv-1268-JDP (P) Plaintiff, v. ORDER Y. SALINAS GOLZALEZ, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff has repeatedly failed to respond to defendants’ motion to compel, which was filed November 8, 2024. ECF No. 38. On January 6, 2025, after plaintiff failed to timely file a response, I ordered plaintiff (1) to show cause why this action should not be dismissed based on his failure to comply with court orders and failure to prosecute, and (2) to file a response to defendants’ motion within twenty-one days. ECF No. 42. In response, plaintiff filed a document that read in its entirety, “Dear courthouse, I would like my case to be heard, it’s not fair for them to get way with what they did to me, please I would like to go forward with the case.” ECF No. 44 (cleaned up). In light of that filing and plaintiff’s pro se status, I granted plaintiff until February 28, 2025, to file a response to…