Rosen

(PC) Hood v. Rosen

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20252:23-cv-01980California4,365 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALFRED FITZGERALD HOOD, Case No. 2:23-cv-1980-KJM-JDP (P) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ROSEN, et al., Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se, alleges that defendants Michael Anderson, Casey Mara, and Joseph Patton—all police officers with the Roseville Police Department—used excessive force against him during his arrest and carried out an illegal search and seizure of his vehicle. He also alleges that Anderson failed to intervene in these unlawful events. ECF No. 17. Defendants move to dismiss, ECF No. 26, plaintiff has filed an opposition, ECF No. 31, and defendants have filed a reply, ECF No. 32. Plaintiff also filed a motion for a 24 1 Plaintiff further alleged that the City of Roseville violated his rights by falsely charging 25 him in connection with the incidents alleged in the second amended complaint. ECF No. 17 at 5. Following screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), ECF No. 18,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.