Gomez-Cepeda

Gomez-Cepeda v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 5, 202524-262California684 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 5 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CAMILO HERNANDO GOMEZ- No. 24-262 CEPEDA; INGRID ESTEFANIA Agency Nos.

PARRADO-MORENO; JOEL MATIAS A220-782-373

GOMEZ-PARRADO, A220-782-397

A220-782-398

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 3, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: CLIFTON, IKUTA, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Camilo Gomez Cepeda, Ingrid Parrado Moreno, and their minor child, Joel

Gomez Parrado (collectively, Petitioners), natives and citizens of Colombia, seek

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.