Gomez-Cepeda
Gomez-Cepeda v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 5, 202524-262California684 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 5 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CAMILO HERNANDO GOMEZ- No. 24-262 CEPEDA; INGRID ESTEFANIA Agency Nos.
PARRADO-MORENO; JOEL MATIAS A220-782-373
GOMEZ-PARRADO, A220-782-397
A220-782-398
Petitioners,
v. MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted March 3, 2025** Pasadena, California
Before: CLIFTON, IKUTA, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
Camilo Gomez Cepeda, Ingrid Parrado Moreno, and their minor child, Joel
Gomez Parrado (collectively, Petitioners), natives and citizens of Colombia, seek
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision…