Adrienne Jensen v. United States Tennis Association

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 5, 202523-15757California1,835 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 5 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ADRIENNE JENSEN, No. 23-15757

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-01905-DJH

v.

MEMORANDUM*

UNITED STATES TENNIS

ASSOCIATION,

Defendant-Appellee.

ADRIENNE JENSEN, No. 23-15799

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-01905-DJH

v.

UNITED STATES TENNIS

ASSOCIATION,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Diane J. Humetewa, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted August 13, 2024 San Francisco, California

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Before: GRABER, CALLAHAN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff Adrienne Jensen (“Jensen”) was sexually abused as a minor by her

tennis coach who was a member of the U.S. Tennis Association (“USTA”). The

coach began abusing Jensen in May 2010 when she was 15 years old, and abused

her on multiple occasions while the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.