Hart

Hart v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 5, 202524-36California971 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 5 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GUY HART, No. 24-

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-03399-FLA-MRW v.

SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. MEMORANDUM*

et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 13, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: WALLACE, GRABER, BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff Guy Hart (“Hart”) appeals from the district court’s judgment in

favor of Defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (“SPS”), and dismissal without

leave to amend his claims against Defendant Bank of America, N.A. (“BANA”).

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

1. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.