Alaska Laborers Health & Security, Retirement, Training & Legal Services Trust Funds v. Alaska Trailblazing, Inc.

Good Law
534 F. App'x 613
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 24, 201311-35845California573 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Plaintiff-Appellant Alaska Laborers Health and Security, Retirement, Training and Legal Services Funds (“Laborers”), appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Defendant-Appellee Alaska Trailblazing, Inc. (“Trailblazing”), on the ground of res judicata. Because the facts and procedural history are familiar to the parties, we do not recite them here, except as necessary to explain our disposition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo both the district court’s determination that res judicata applies and its order granting summary judgment on that ground. See Clark v. Bear Stearns & Co., 966 F.2d 1318, 1320 (9th Cir.1992). We affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment.

It is undisputed that the prior action was between the same parties and concluded in a final judgment on the merits. We analyze whether or not a subsequent claim is based on the same “cause of action” by considering, among other factors, “whether the two suits arise out of the same transactional nucleus of facts.” Costantini v. Trans World Airlines, 681 F.2d 1199, 1201-02 (9th Cir.1982). To avoid “repetitive litigation,” we consider whether claims…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.