Pacific Mercantile Bank v. Cahbad of California CA4/2
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 24, 2013E055670California4,872 words
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 7/24/13 Pacific Mercantile Bank v. Cahbad of California CA4/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
PACIFIC MERCANTILE BANK,
Plaintiff and Respondent, E055670
v. (Super.Ct.No. UDDS1106368)
CHABAD OF CALIFORNIA et al., OPINION
Defendants and Appellants.
APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Donna G. Garza,
Judge. Reversed.
Michael J. Simkin for Defendants and Appellants.
The Wolf Firm and Joseph J. Nardulli for Plaintiff and Respondent.
This is an unlawful detainer action. In November 2011, plaintiff and respondent
Pacific Merchantile Bank (the Bank) foreclosed on property owned by defendant and
appellant…