Pacific Mercantile Bank v. Cahbad of California CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 24, 2013E055670California4,872 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/24/13 Pacific Mercantile Bank v. Cahbad of California CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

PACIFIC MERCANTILE BANK,

Plaintiff and Respondent, E055670

v. (Super.Ct.No. UDDS1106368)

CHABAD OF CALIFORNIA et al., OPINION

Defendants and Appellants.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Donna G. Garza,

Judge. Reversed.

Michael J. Simkin for Defendants and Appellants.

The Wolf Firm and Joseph J. Nardulli for Plaintiff and Respondent.

This is an unlawful detainer action. In November 2011, plaintiff and respondent

Pacific Merchantile Bank (the Bank) foreclosed on property owned by defendant and

appellant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.