Heineman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DALE SCOTT HEINEMAN, Case No. 24-cv-06207-WHO

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON THE MOTIONS TO STAY

v. AND MOTION TO DISMISS

WILLIAM H. ALSUP, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 8, 10, 22 Defendants.

Pro se plaintiff Dale Scott Heineman alleges eighty-seven causes of action against the Hon. William H. Alsup, United States Attorney General Merrick Garland, United States Attorney Ismail Ramsey, and Assistant United States Attorneys James E. Keller, David Hall, and Nikhil Bhagat.1 (Together, “Federal Defendants”). The Federal Defendants are immune from suit, and the law is clear that any amendment would be futile. Accordingly, I GRANT Federal Defendants’ motion to dismiss without leave to amend. Mr. Heineman’s motions to stay are denied as moot. Dkt. Nos. 8, 22. BACKGROUND Mr. Heineman filed a complaint on September 3, 2024, and on the same day filed a document titled “Memorandum of Points and Authorities, Conclusions of…