(PC) Portillo v. City of Shafter

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 5, 20251:23-cv-00920California944 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARIO R. RODAS PORTILLO, Case No. 1:23-cv-00920-JLT-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE CITY OF SHAFTER, et al., FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE Defendants. 16 I. Background Plaintiff Mario R. Rodas Portillo, a former county jail inmate and former state prisoner, proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 15, 2025, the Court screened Plaintiff’s second amended complaint and granted him leave to amend within thirty days. (Doc. 28.) On January 27, 2025, the Court’s order was returned as “Undeliverable, Unable to Forward.” II. Discussion Plaintiff is required to keep the Court apprised of a current address at all times. Effective January 1, 2025, Local Rule 183(b) provides:

Address Changes. A party appearing in propria persona shall keep the Court and opposing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.