Paul Butakov v. Oscar Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 5, 20252:24-cv-09655California1,167 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

J S - 6 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL BUTAKOV, Case No. 2:24-cv-09655-SSS (AGR) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR

FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A

v.

COURT ORDER

OSCAR INSURANCE COMPANY,

15 et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 INTRODUCTION On November 5, 2025, Plaintiff filed a Complaint and a Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP request”). [Dkt. 1, 5]. Plaintiff raised several claims related to the allegedly improper treatment of his heart condition. [Dkt. 1]. On December 18, 2024, the Court postponed ruling on the IFP request until Plaintiff provided more information. [Dkt. 9]. Specifically, Plaintiff was ordered to file an Amended Complaint against Oscar Insurance Company, because the claims against the other Defendants were barred by res judicata or Eleventh Amendment immunity. Id. Plaintiff was warned that the failure to comply with the order would result in dismissal of the action. Id. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.