Adaeze Nwosu v. Cascade Investment, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL
Case No. 2:24-cv-09100-SPG-SSC Date March 4, 2025 Title Nwosu v. Cascade Investment, LLC et al.
a Present: The Honorable SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
P. Gomez Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not Present Not Present
Proceeding: (INCHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD
NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO FILE PROOFS OF PROPER
SERVICE WITHIN THE TIME REQUIRED BY FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE 4(m) Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) provides that “[i]f a defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the courf—on its own motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff-—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Courts have “broad discretion” under Rule 4(m). See Efaw v. Williams, 473 F.3d 1038, 1041 (9th…