Parales

(PC) Bennett v. Parales

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 5, 20251:24-cv-00591California537 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARIO BENNETT, ) Case No.: 1:24-cv-0591 JLT BAM ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND ) RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING THE v. ) ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, ) AND DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO PALARES, et al., ) CLOSE THE CASE ) Defendants. ) (Doc. 24) ) )

Mario Bennett, a transgender female, seeks to hold the defendants liable for violations of civil rights under the First, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments while housed at Kern Valley State Prison. (See Doc. 23 at 3-7.) The magistrate judge screened Plaintiff’s third amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a) and found Plaintiff failed to comply with Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and failed to state a cognizable claim. (Doc. 24.) The magistrate judge observed, even while considering the attachments to the complaint that, “Plaintiff’s allegations are conclusory and do not state…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.