Intrepid Automation, Inc. v. 3D Systems Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 5, 20253:24-cv-02262California2,605 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 INTREPID AUTOMATION, INC., Case No.: 24-cv-2262-AGS-DDL

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

EXPEDITED DISCOVERY

3D SYSTEMS CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants. [Dkt. No. 32] 16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Intrepid Automation, Inc. (“Intrepid”) moves for expedited discovery in this patent infringement action, contending the discovery will allow it to determine whether to seek a preliminary injunction. Defendants 3D Systems Corporation and 3D Systems, Inc. (collectively “3D Systems”) oppose the motion. Dkt. No. 39. Having considered the parties’ briefing and their arguments at the motion hearing on February 20, 2025, the Court concludes Intrepid has established good cause for expedited discovery pertaining to the PSLA 270, the 3D Systems printer system that Intrepid alleges infringes its patents and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.