Kirkpatrick

Kirkpatrick v. Samuel

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 5, 20254:24-cv-08609California615 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 WILLIAM KIRKPATRICK, Case No. 24-cv-08609-JST

Petitioner,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

v.

D. SAMUEL, Respondent.

12 Petitioner has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. ECF No. 1. For the reasons set forth below, this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. DISCUSSION On December 2, 2024, Petitioner filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in this Court, stating that he wished to appeal the California Supreme Court’s September 18, 2024 Order in Cal. Sup. Ct. C No. S004642, People v. Kirkpatrick. ECF No. 1. That same day, the Court sent Petitioner a notice, informing him that this action was deficient because he had neither paid the $5.00 filing fee nor filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 2. The Court informed Petitioner that, by December 31, 2024, he must either pay the filing fee or by file a complete in forma pauperis application; or this action would be dismissed. Id. The deadline to correct the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.