Anthony
Anthony v. County of San Diego
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARIAN ANTHONY, JASMINE Case No. 25-cv-0310-BAS-MMP
JOHANESEN,
ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR
Plaintiffs, EX PARTE TEMPORARY v. RESTRAINING ORDER
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., (ECF No. 4) Defendants.
Before the Court is pro se Plaintiffs’ Marian Anthony (“Anthony”) and Jasmine Johanesen’s (“Johanesen”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) Ex Parte Request for a Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”). (Request, ECF No. 4.) Having carefully considered Plaintiffs’ Request and the applicable law, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s TRO Request. For a court to grant a TRO, the moving party must show: (1) a likelihood of success on the merits; (2) a likelihood of irreparable harm to the moving party in the absence of preliminary relief; (3) that the balance of equities tips in favor of the moving party; and (4) that an injunction is in the public interest. Winter v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555…