Doer
(PC) McMillion v. Doer
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SKYLER McMILLION, No. 1:24-cv-01557-KES-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DENYING
v. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AS
UNNECESSARY
J. DOER, et al., (ECF Nos. 7, 15) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights complaint pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). On December 20, 2024, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why the action should not be dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to exhaust the administrative remedies. (ECF No. 5.) Plaintiff did not file a response, and Findings and Recommendations recommending dismissal of the action were issued on January 22, 2025. (ECF No. 7.) After receiving an extension of time, Plaintiff filed a response to the now-discharged order to show cause, motion for 90-day extension of time for all pending deadlines, and motion to create a class action.1…