Elliott

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 IN RE: FUTURE MOTION, INC. Case No. 5:23-md-03087-BLF

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

This Document Relates to: ENFORCE SETTLEMENT

Elliott v. Future Motion, Inc., [Re: MDL Dkt. No. 128; No. 23-cv-06426 No. 23-cv-06426-BLF Dkt. No. 23]

12 Before the Court is Plaintiff Schuyler Elliott’s (“Elliott”) Opposed Motion to Enforce the Parties’ Agreement to Settle. MDL Dkt. No. 128; No. 23-cv-06426 Dkt. No. 23 (“Mot.”). Defendant Future Motion, Inc. (“Future Motion”) opposes Elliott’s motion. MDL Dkt. No. 130; No. 23-cv-06426 Dkt. No. 24 (“Opp.”). Elliott filed a reply in support of the motion. MDL Dkt. No. 131; No. 23-cv-06426 Dkt. No. 25 (“Reply”). The Court previously determined that this motion is suitable for disposition without oral argument and vacated the hearing date. MDL Dkt. No. 297; No. 23-cv-06426 Dkt. No. 32. For the following reasons, the Court hereby DENIES Elliott’s motion. I. …