Manning

(PC) Marti v. Manning

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 5, 20252:21-cv-01829California5,398 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALEX LAMOTA MARTI, No. 2:21-cv-01829 SCR P

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER AND PROTECTIVE ORDER

TODD MANNING, et al.,

Defendants.

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. §

1983. On November 13, 2024, the undersigned granted in part and denied in part plaintiff’s motion to compel (ECF No. 37) and ordered defendants to submit responsive grievances and appeals to the court for in camera review (ECF No. 89). Having completed the review, the undersigned rules that defendants may withhold the following seven grievances on third-party privacy grounds: (1) 231290; (2) 233850; (3) 239923; (4) 241813; (5) 242824; (6) 244601; and (7) 248112. However, defendants must produce the following fifteen grievances/appeals consistent with the instructions and Protective Order below: (1) 19-00713; (2) 18-04568; (3) 139696; (4) 19-04688; (5) 246627; (6) 262149; (7) 18-02819; (8)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.