(PC) James v. Sacramento County Sheriff Dept.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 5, 20252:23-cv-00853California413 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONALD EUGENE JAMES, No. 2:23-CV-0853-DC-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER RICHARDSON, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court are Plaintiff’s motions regarding law library access. See ECF No. 23 and 38. On November 12, 2024, the District Judge issued an order directing that this action proceed on the first amended complaint on Plaintiff’s Claim I for retaliation against Defendants Powell and Almed, and Plaintiff’s Claim IV for medical deliberate indifference against Defendants Richardson and Banks. See ECF No. 29. All other claims and defendants were dismissed. See id. Defendants filed their answer on January 7, 2025, see ECF No. 32, and the case has been scheduled, see ECF No. 34. / / / / / / / / / ] In the pending motions, Plaintiff states that non-party staff at the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.