(HC) Calderon v. Board of Parole Hearings of CA

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 5, 20252:23-cv-02554California712 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JUAN CARLOS CALDERON, No. 2:23-cv-02554-DAD-CKD (PC) Petitioner, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUMMARILY

BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS, DISMISSING PETITION

CALIFORNIA,

(Doc. Nos. 1, 6) Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 23, 2024, the assigned magistrate judge reviewed the pending petition and issued findings and recommendations recommending that it be summarily dismissed because it failed to state any cognizable claim for federal habeas relief. (Doc. No. 6.) Specifically, the magistrate judge concluded that petitioner’s claims all focused on his challenges to state parole denials or the representation he received in connection with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.