Galusha

Galusha v. Pennington CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 24, 2013B241421California1,772 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/24/13 Galusha v. Pennington CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

RAYMOND GALUSHA, 2d Civil No. B241421 (Super. Ct. No. 56-2010-00376489- Plaintiff and Appellant, CU-PO-SIM) (Ventura County) v.

THERESA PENNINGTON et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

Plaintiff Raymond Galusha filed an action for premises liability and intentional torts against defendants Rancho Simi Recreation and Park District (the District) and its employee, Theresa Pennington. The trial court granted summary judgment for defendants. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

While hiking on an undeveloped dirt trail in the Tierra Rejada Park, Galusha was attacked by two dogs. He suffered…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.