Hogan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 RU HOGAN, No. 2:24-cv-03566-JAM-SCR Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS

CITY OF ROCKLIN, and DOES

THROUGH 100,

13 Defendants. 14 Before the Court is City of Rocklin’s (“Defendant”) motion to dismiss two causes of action in Ru Hogan’s (“Plaintiff”) First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). See Mot., ECF No. 11. Defendant also asks the Court to take judicial notice of its municipal code. See Request for Judicial Notice, ECF No. 11-2. Plaintiff has failed to file a timely opposition to Defendant’s motions. Pursuant to Local Rule 230(c), the Court construes Plaintiff’s failure to oppose as a non-opposition to the motions. The Court grants Defendant’s request for judicial notice of sections of the City of Rocklin Municipal Code because these laws are a matter of public record. See Reyn’s Pasta Bella LLC v. Visa USA, Inc., 442 F.3d 741, 746 n.6 (9th Cir. 2006). The Court also finds Defendant’s motion to…