Hogan
Hogan v. Mohlenbrok
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RU HOGAN, No. 2:24-cv-03566-JAM-SCR Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO STRIKE
CITY OF ROCKLIN, and DOES
THROUGH 100,
15 Defendants. 16 Before the Court is City of Rocklin’s (“Defendant”) motion to strike three causes of action in Ru Hogan’s (“Plaintiff”) First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). See Mot., ECF No. 12. Plaintiff has failed to file a timely opposition to Defendant’s motion. Pursuant to Local Rule 230(c), the Court construes Plaintiff’s failure to oppose as a non-opposition to the motion. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion. California Code of Civil Procedure provides, “A cause of action against a person arising from any act of that person in furtherance of the person’s right of petition or free speech under the United States Constitution or the California Constitution in connection with a public issue shall be subject to a special motion to strike, unless the court…