Hogan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 RU HOGAN, No. 2:24-cv-03566-JAM-SCR Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING DAVID

MOHLENBROK’S MOTION FOR

CITY OF ROCKLIN, and DOES ATTORNEY’S FEES

THROUGH 100,

13 Defendants. 14 Before the Court is David Mohlenbrok’s (“Mohlenbrok”) motion for attorney’s fees. See Mot., ECF No. 15. Ru Hogan (“Plaintiff”) has failed to file a timely opposition to Mohlenbrok’s motion. Pursuant to Local Rule 230(c), the Court construes Plaintiff’s failure to oppose as a non-opposition to the motion. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Mohlenbrok’s motion. Mohlenbrok brought a motion to strike three causes of action under California’s anti-SLAPP statute. See Mot. to Strike, ECF No. 5; Cal. Civ. Proc. Code 425.16. In response to the motion, and in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1)(B), Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) that dismissed Mohlenbrok as a defendant in this action. See FAC at 2, ECF…