CACERF Norco v. City of Norco CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff and appellant, CACERF Norco, LLC (CACERF), is the owner of
approximately 428 acres in the City of Norco. It filed the present writ petition and
1 declaratory relief/inverse condemnation action against defendants and respondents, City
of Norco and the City Council of the City of Norco (collectively, the City), contending
that changes in the City’s general plan and zoning ordinances resulted in a taking of
CACERF’s property under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. We disagree.
We affirm the trial court’s denial of CACERF’s petition for writ of mandate and
the judgment entered on the declaratory relief/inverse condemnation action. We find that
to the extent CACERF’s petition is a “facial” challenge to the general plan designation
and zoning ordinance, the regulations do not deprive CACERF of all economically
beneficial or productive use of its land. To the extent CACERF’s attack is an “as
applied” challenge to the general plan designation and zoning ordinance, the claim is not
ripe.
II. FACTS
The property in question is approximately 428 acres in size. Immediately prior to
the subject general plan amendment and zone change the property was…