Bassil

Bassil v. Sarkis CA1/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 24, 2013A136401California4,512 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/24/13 Bassil v. Sarkis CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

GERMAN BASSIL,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

A136401

v. STEFAN SARKIS et al., (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. RG10534730) Defendants and Respondents.

Plaintiff German Bassil appeals from a judgment dismissing his second amended complaint against defendants Stefan Sarkis and Alexandra Moari following the sustaining of defendants’ demurrer. We reverse the judgment as to plaintiff’s cause of action for fraud and affirm the dismissal of his other causes of action.

I. BACKROUND

On September 2, 2010, plaintiff sued defendants Sarkis and Moari for fraud, breach of oral contract, and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. He sued Tetyana Segadina in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.