David Thompson v. Isidro Baca

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 6, 202522-16702California639 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 6 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAVID C. THOMPSON, No. 22-16702

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:17-cv-00670-RCJ-CSD v.

ISIDRO BACA, Warden; et al., MEMORANDUM*

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Robert Clive Jones, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 6, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: FRIEDLAND, BENNETT, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff David C. Thompson appeals the district court’s order denying his

“motion to reset the settlement agreement” with Defendants Isidro Baca, et al. We

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). affirm.

1. Defendants, citing Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S.

375, 381–82 (1994), contend that our court lacks jurisdiction to consider…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.