David Thompson v. Isidro Baca
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 6, 202522-16702California639 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 6 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DAVID C. THOMPSON, No. 22-16702
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:17-cv-00670-RCJ-CSD v.
ISIDRO BACA, Warden; et al., MEMORANDUM*
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Robert Clive Jones, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 6, 2025** San Francisco, California
Before: FRIEDLAND, BENNETT, and BADE, Circuit Judges.
Plaintiff David C. Thompson appeals the district court’s order denying his
“motion to reset the settlement agreement” with Defendants Isidro Baca, et al. We
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). affirm.
1. Defendants, citing Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S.
375, 381–82 (1994), contend that our court lacks jurisdiction to consider…