People v. Perez CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 6, 2025G063781California511 words

Opinion

Opinion

Moore, J.

DISCUSSION

“Prior to January 1, 2020, section 667.5, subdivision (b) required trial courts to impose a one-year sentence enhancement for each true finding on an allegation the defendant had served a separate prior prison term and had not remained free of custody for at least five years. [Citation.] Effective January 1, 2020, Senate Bill No. 136 (2019-2020 Reg. Sess.) . . . (Stats. 2019, ch. 590) [(SB 136)] amended section 667.5 by limiting the prior prison term enhancement to only prior terms for sexually violent offenses. [Citations.] Enhancements based on prior prison terms served for other offenses became legally invalid.” (People v. Burgess (2022) 86 Cal.App.5th 375, 379–380.)

3 “Later, in 2021, the Legislature enacted Senate Bill No. 483 (2021-2022 Reg. Sess.) (Senate Bill 483). This bill sought to make the changes implemented by [SB] 136 retroactive. [Citation.] It took effect on January 1, 2022, and added former section 1171.1, now section 1172.75, to the Penal Code. (Stats. 2021, ch. 728, § 3; Stats. 2022, ch. 58, § 12.)” (Ibid.) Section 1172.75 directs the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to identify those “currently serving a term for a judgment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.