Ricky Dillingham v. K. Mills

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 RICKY DILLINGHAM, Case No. CV 24-02966-JGB (AS) Plaintiff,

ORDER ACCEPTING IN PART AND

v.

REJECTING IN PART FINDINGS,

K. MILLS, et, al.,

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMNEDATIONS OF

Defendants.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

15 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, all of the records herein, and the Report and Recommendation of a United States Magistrate Judge (“R&R”). After having made a de novo determination of the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Objections were directed, the Court concurs with and accepts, in part, and rejects, in part, the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. 23 The Magistrate Judge recommends that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss be granted and the Complaint be dismissed without leave to amend, on the grounds that Plaintiff failed to state a claim for violation of due process and failed to exhaust available administrative…