(HC) Papazian v. B.M. Trate
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES MICHAEL PAPAZIAN, 1:24-cv-00392-HBK (HC) Petitioner,
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STAY
v. (Doc. No. 35) B.M. TRATE,
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME
Respondent.
16 17 18 Petitioner, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this habeas corpus action under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 filed a motion to stay the proceedings on February 24, 2025. (Doc. No. 35). Petitioner requests request that his case be stayed for ninety days because he is being moved to a different penitentiary and he estimates it will take a “month or two” for his property to be delivered after his arrival. (Id.). Petitioner filed his Second Amended Petition on November 25, 2025. (Doc. No. 29). Respondent filed a Motion to Dismiss on February 18, 2025. (Doc. No. 33, “Motion’). On February 21, 2025, Petitioner was granted an extension of time to April 4, 2025 to file a response to the Motion. (Doc. No. 34). In the instant motion, Petitioner seeks to stay the case for…