(PC) Baggett v. City of Fresno

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 6, 20251:24-cv-01013California1,572 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY ALBERT BAGGETT, No. 1:24-cv-01013 GSA (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

v.

ORDER RECOMMENDING MATTER BE

CITY OF FRESNO, et al., DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO OBEY A

COURT ORDER

Defendants. (ECF No. 7)

PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS DUE IN

FOURTEEN DAYS 18 Plaintiff, an individual who appears to be a former civil detainee, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this matter. He has filed it seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. For the reasons stated below, the undersigned will recommend that this matter be dismissed for failure to obey a court order. Plaintiff will have fourteen days from the date of this order to file objections to it. I. RELEVANT FACTS On August 14, 2024, Plaintiff’s complaint and his motion to proceed in forma…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.