Singh

Singh v. Bardini

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 6, 20251:24-cv-01275California366 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KARANDEEP SINGH, Case No. 1:24-cv-01275-KES-SAB 11 Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING WHY SANCTIONS v. SHOULD NOT ISSUE 13 EMILIA BARDINI, et al., (ECF No. 8) 14 Defendants. SEVEN DAY DEADLINE 15 On February 26, 2025, the Court entered the parties’ untimely stipulation that the new date for Defendants to file an answer or other dispositive pleading is March 3, 2025. (ECF No. 9.) Therein, the Court noted that “[s]hould Defendants miss a further deadline, the Court will issue an order to show cause and will consider imposing sanctions.” (Id.) As of March 6, 2025, Defendants have not filed an answer or responsive pleading. Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions . . . within the inherent power of the Court.” The Court has the inherent power to control its…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.