Khankin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 ELIYAHU KHANKIN, Case No. 24-cv-04030-SVK

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS

v. SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

CSL BEHRING, L.L.C., Re: Dkt. No. 27 Defendant.

The history of this employment case is set forth in the Court’s orders on Defendant CSL Behring, L.L.C.’s motion to dismiss the original complaint (Dkt. 15) and motion to dismiss the first amended complaint (Dkt. 24). Now before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss one cause of action in Plaintiff’s second amended complaint (Dkt. 25 – the “SAC”): the eleventh cause of action for invasion of Plaintiff’s privacy rights under the California Constitution. Dkt. 27. All Parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge. Dkt. 6, 8. The motion is suitable for determination without oral argument. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). Having reviewed the SAC, the Parties’ briefs, the litigation history, and the relevant law, Defendant’s motion to dismiss the eleventh cause…