Doer

(PC) Coissy v. Doer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 6, 20251:24-cv-01556California820 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MAXSONY COISSY, Case No. 1:24-cv-01556-KES-BAM (PC) Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME WITHOUT

v. PREJUDICE (ECF No. 10) DOER, et al.,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO CREATE A

Defendants. CLASS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE (ECF No. 11) 16 Plaintiff Maxsony Coissy (“Plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) and the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b). On March 3, 2025, Plaintiff filed a motion for extension of time and a motion to create a class action. (ECF Nos. 10, 11.) Plaintiff requests an extension of 90 days to respond to anything in this case, because the mail room at his current institution is backed up, resulting in a 30 to 60-day delay before Plaintiff receives the mail. (ECF No. 10.) Plaintiff also requests the 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.