Biden

(PC) Heizelman v. Biden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 6, 20251:25-cv-00153California1,433 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT HEIZELMAN, Case No.: 1:25-cv-0153 JLT SKO Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING

v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS, AND DIRECTING

JOE BIDEN, et al., PLAINTIFF TO PAY THE FILING FEE IN

FULL WITHIN 30 DAYS

Defendants. (Docs. 2, 8) 16 Robert Heizelman seeks to proceed in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983, in which he asserts claims against several defendants including President Joe Biden, the “Tik Tok Byte Dance,” “Deep State Feds,” Jamie Harrison, Merrick Garland, Christopher Wray, and John Bolton. (See Docs. 1, 2.) The magistrate judge reviewed Plaintiff’s litigation history and found he accrued three or more strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, identifying the following case dismissals:

1. Heizelman v. Biden, Case No. 3:23-cv-01185-JES-AHG (S.D. Cal.) (dismissed for failure to pay filing fee and as frivolous on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.