Fong
Fong v. U.S. Bancorp
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PETER FONG, et al., No. 2:22-cv-01291-DC-CSK Plaintiffs, v. ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’
RENEWED MOTION TO COMPEL
U.S. BANCORP, et al., ARBITRATION AND DENYING
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STRIKE AS
Defendants. MOOT (Doc. Nos. 39, 40)
17 This matter came before the court on February 21, 2025 for a hearing on Defendants’ renewed motion to compel arbitration and Plaintiffs’ motion to strike. (Doc. Nos. 39, 40.) Attorney J. Toji Calabro appeared on behalf of Plaintiffs. Attorneys Michael Krauss and Karin Bohmholdt appeared on behalf of Defendants. For the reasons explained below, the court will deny Defendants’ renewed motion to compel arbitration and deny Plaintiffs’ motion to strike as having been rendered moot. BACKGROUND On April 21, 2000, Plaintiffs Peter Fong and Sut Fong (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) opened a safe deposit box at one of the…