(PS) Arnold v. Lion's Club International Assoc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KIMBLY ARNOLD and RONALD No. 2:24-cv-2095 DAD AC PS
DUNHAM, II,
12 Plaintiffs, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v.
LION’S CLUB INTERNATIONAL
ASSOCIATION, et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiffs are proceeding in this action pro se. The action was accordingly referred to the undersigned for pretrial matters by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21). On October 18, 2024, the court granted plaintiff Arnold’s in forma pauperis (“IFP”) application but rejected the complaint pursuant to the IFP screening process, granting plaintiffs 30 days to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 5. Plaintiffs were cautioned that failure to do so could lead to a recommendation that the action be dismissed. Plaintiffs did not file an amended complaint within the time limit. On January 24, 2025, the court issued an order to show cause within 14 days why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. ECF No. 4. Plaintiffs’ mail was returned to the court,…