Valdez

Valdez v. Dudek

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 7, 202523-3880California1,251 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 7 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WILLIAM ESTUARDO VALDEZ, No. 23-3880 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:20-cv-11256-HDV-AGR v.

MEMORANDUM*

LELAND DUDEK, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Hernan Diego Vera, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 4, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: OWENS, LEE, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

William Estuardo Valdez appeals from a district court order affirming the

Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ) denial of his applications for disability income

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). benefits and supplemental security income benefits. We have jurisdiction under

U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

We review the district court’s order upholding…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.