Iten

Iten v. County of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 7, 202524-2974California517 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAR 7 2025

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PATRICIA ITEN, Personal Representative No. 24-2974 of the Estate of Howard Iten, D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:21-cv-00486-DDP-SSC

v. MEMORANDUM*

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dean D. Pregerson, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 3, 2025 Pasadena, California

Before: CLIFTON, IKUTA, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Howard Iten appeals from the district court’s ruling dismissing with

prejudice his operative complaint on the merits.1 We have jurisdiction under

U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. 1 Howard Iten passed away during the pendency of this action, and the court substituted his spouse and the personal representative of his estate, Patricia Iten, as the plaintiff-appellant in this case. Dkt. No. 36. The County…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.