In re L.N. CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
I. BACKGROUND
The sole issue here is Cal-ICWA compliance, so we need not detail the
circumstances leading to L.N.’s removal from her mother, defendant and appellant J.C.
(mother), or mother’s actions after removal. Plaintiff and respondent Riverside County
Department of Public Social Services (the department) petitioned for L.N. under section
300 in April 2023, and in October 2024 the juvenile court determined that Cal-ICWA did
not apply and terminated mother’s parental rights to L.N. L.N.’s father, M.N. (father),
was also named in the petition and had his parental rights terminated, but he has not
1 Undesignated statutory references are to the Welfare & Institutions Code, and undesignated rule references are to the California Rules of Court. Also, “we use the term ‘Indian’ throughout to reflect the statutory language.” (In re Dezi C. (2024) 16 Cal.5th 1112, 1125, fn. 1.) No disrespect is intended.
2 appealed. Mother’s appeal, however, focuses solely on father’s relatives, so our focus is
on the department’s contacts with father.