Irizarry
Irizarry v. Kijakazi
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AIDA I., Case No.: 22-cv-1423-DEB
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
v. COUNSEL’S MOTION FOR
ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO
LELAND DUDEK, Acting Commissioner U.S.C. § 406(b) of Social Security,1 15 Defendant. [DKT. NO. 28]
17 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Counsel’s Motion for Attorney Fees Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Dkt. No. 28. Neither Plaintiff nor the Commissioner oppose the Motion. Dkt. No. 29 (Commissioner’s Statement of Non-Opposition). For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS the Motion. I. BACKGROUND In March 2019, Plaintiff Aida I. filed a complaint seeking judicial review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s (“Commissioner”) denial of her application for disability benefits. Aida I. v. Saul, No. 19-cv-0476-AJB-RNB, 2020 WL 434319, at *1
1 Leland Dudek is substituted for Kilolo Kijakazi pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d).
28 (S.D. Cal. Jan. 28,…