Irizarry

Irizarry v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 7, 20253:22-cv-01423California1,090 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AIDA I., Case No.: 22-cv-1423-DEB

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. COUNSEL’S MOTION FOR

ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO

LELAND DUDEK, Acting Commissioner U.S.C. § 406(b) of Social Security,1 15 Defendant. [DKT. NO. 28]

17 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Counsel’s Motion for Attorney Fees Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Dkt. No. 28. Neither Plaintiff nor the Commissioner oppose the Motion. Dkt. No. 29 (Commissioner’s Statement of Non-Opposition). For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS the Motion. I. BACKGROUND In March 2019, Plaintiff Aida I. filed a complaint seeking judicial review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s (“Commissioner”) denial of her application for disability benefits. Aida I. v. Saul, No. 19-cv-0476-AJB-RNB, 2020 WL 434319, at *1

1 Leland Dudek is substituted for Kilolo Kijakazi pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d).

28 (S.D. Cal. Jan. 28,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.