Greist

Greist v. LendUS, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 7, 20253:24-cv-02411California3,306 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BARBARA GREIST, et al., Case No. 24-cv-02411-AMO

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. COMPEL ARBITRATION & DENYING

AS MOOT MOTION TO STAY

LENDUS, LLC, et al., PENDING RULING ON MOTION TO

COMPEL ARBITRATION

Defendants. 11 Re: Dkt. Nos. 29,

12 Before the Court are LendUS LLC’s motion to compel arbitration and its motion to stay the case pending a ruling on that motion. The motions are suitable for disposition without hearing pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). Accordingly, the March 13, 2025 hearing is VACATED. Having carefully considered the papers filed by the parties and the relevant legal authority, the Court DENIES LendUS’s motion to compel arbitration for the reasons set forth below. Because this order resolves the motion to compel arbitration, LendUS’s motion to stay this case pending a ruling on that motion DENIED AS MOOT. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Barbara Greist worked as a Loan Assistant for LendUS from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.