Greist
Greist v. LendUS, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BARBARA GREIST, et al., Case No. 24-cv-02411-AMO
Plaintiffs,
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
v. COMPEL ARBITRATION & DENYING
AS MOOT MOTION TO STAY
LENDUS, LLC, et al., PENDING RULING ON MOTION TO
COMPEL ARBITRATION
Defendants. 11 Re: Dkt. Nos. 29,
12 Before the Court are LendUS LLC’s motion to compel arbitration and its motion to stay the case pending a ruling on that motion. The motions are suitable for disposition without hearing pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). Accordingly, the March 13, 2025 hearing is VACATED. Having carefully considered the papers filed by the parties and the relevant legal authority, the Court DENIES LendUS’s motion to compel arbitration for the reasons set forth below. Because this order resolves the motion to compel arbitration, LendUS’s motion to stay this case pending a ruling on that motion DENIED AS MOOT. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Barbara Greist worked as a Loan Assistant for LendUS from…