Rosen

Rosen v. Nelson CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 25, 2013D062501California3,461 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/25/13 Rosen v. Nelson CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SAMUEL ROSEN, D062501

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2012-00052830-

CU-DF-NC)

BEATRICE NELSON,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Earl Maas III,

Judge. Affirmed.

Samuel Rosen, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

No appearance for Defendant and Respondent.

In this defamation action involving two residents at the San Luis Rey Homes

mobile home park (SLRH) in Oceanside, California, plaintiff Samuel Rosen appeals in

propria persona an order granting the Code of Civil Procedure1 section 425.

motion─commonly known as an anti-SLAPP…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.